Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/195
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTekalign, Meron-
dc.contributor.authorFlasseb, Charlotte-
dc.contributor.authorFranklc, Amaury-
dc.contributor.authorVan Rompaey, Anton-
dc.contributor.authorPoesenb, Jean-
dc.contributor.authorNyssend, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorMuysb, Bart-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-11T08:58:58Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-11T08:58:58Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/195-
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding of the often complex forest cover change drivers, and the perceived and observed forest cover changes substantially contributes to the sustainable management of tropical forests. This paper aims at devel- oping an integrated view on tropical forest cover change and its drivers by combining the perception of the stakeholders (farmers, forest guards, and forest managers) and five decades forest cover mapping, based on interview and remote sensing respectively, through a case study in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Afforestation and deforestation occurred when law enforcement was stronger and weaker respectively, de- pending on political regimes. Since 1937 i.e., the early Imperial period, the position of the forest edge has not changed much over time, it rather became sharper. In the late Imperial era (1972–1975), the forest cover de- clined only by 1.6%. In the subsequent two governments, the socialist and the current federal rule (1975–2014), the forest cover increased by 17%. There was a 3.9% forest cover decline during the transition between the two governments. This pattern of overall net forest cover increase observed by remote sensing data has been cor- rectly perceived by stakeholders. Stakeholders acknowledged the observed forest cover increase, however, they argued that the forest is declining in terms of its quality for several ecosystem services (ES). The ES decline is believed to have resulted from the gradual shift of pure dense indigenous forest to an increasing share of exotic plantations. In the three political regimes, land policy, illegal encroachments, population pressure and social unrest have been the leading drivers of forest cover change. Communities' involvement in forest management activities and sharing benefits were regarded as positive perception of forest management strategies during the federal administration (1993–2007) of the current government by farmers. Among the factors that determine forest management strategies proposed by stakeholders are gender, landholding size, education level and age. Future conservation and development interventions need to consider stakeholders' concerns. Their involvement in forest management is also necessary for improved biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service provision, and social wellbeing.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAfforestationen_US
dc.subjectDeforestationen_US
dc.subjectForest qualityen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectCommunity participationen_US
dc.subjectForest management strategiesen_US
dc.titleForest cover loss and recovery in an East African remnant forest area: Understanding its context and drivers for conservation and sustainable ecosystem service provisionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Forest cover loss and recovery (Tekalign et al ).pdf979.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in HoAREC Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.