<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/4">
    <title>HoAREC Repository Community:</title>
    <link>http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/4</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/200" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/199" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/198" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/183" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-05-25T04:14:43Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/200">
    <title>Recent resettlement programs, as drivers for Afromontane forest loss in the Hawa-Galan district of Ethiopia</title>
    <link>http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/200</link>
    <description>Title: Recent resettlement programs, as drivers for Afromontane forest loss in the Hawa-Galan district of Ethiopia
Authors: Yadeta, Teferi; Tsegay Deribew, Kiros; Getahun, Kefelegn; Getahun, Kefelegn; Debesa, Gemechu; Abreha, Girmay
Abstract: Abstract: Ethiopia has been experiencing resettlement programs primarily as&#xD;
a response to the tragedy of land degradation. The program, however, resulted in&#xD;
&#xD;
massive deforestation in the resettled sites. This study, therefore, aimed at evalu-&#xD;
ating the impact of resettlement on the moist evergreen Afromontane forest cover&#xD;
&#xD;
between 2000 and 2018 in the Hawa-Galan district. Landsat TM of 2000, ETM+ of&#xD;
2010, and OLI of 2018 were used to detect forest cover change. Likewise, an&#xD;
explanatory sequential approach of mixed research design was used. Hence, 118&#xD;
participants out of the total 2232 indigenous and resettled households were&#xD;
employed to survey the impact of deforestation.The study area lost 55% of its total&#xD;
area over the last two decades, corresponding to average deforestation rates of&#xD;
2.06, 6.75, and 4.14% for the corresponding periods: 2000–2010, 2010–2018, and&#xD;
&#xD;
2000–2018, respectively. Our findings also revealed the demographic, socioeco-&#xD;
nomic, and backgrounds of the resettlers were the prominent triggers. Conversion of&#xD;
&#xD;
forests to other uses will have far-reaching impacts on the residual biodiversity and&#xD;
ecosystem services. Therefore, in the light of resettlement, it is high time for the&#xD;
Ethiopian government to revisit its intervention strategies and resettlement policies&#xD;
in the forest priority areas.</description>
    <dc:date>2022-06-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/199">
    <title>Stochastic modeling of urban growth using the CA- Markov chain and multi-scenario prospects in the  tropical humid region of Ethiopia: Mettu</title>
    <link>http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/199</link>
    <description>Title: Stochastic modeling of urban growth using the CA- Markov chain and multi-scenario prospects in the  tropical humid region of Ethiopia: Mettu
Authors: Megersa, Wendiwesen; Tsegay Deribew, Kiros; Abreha, Girmay; Liqa, Tebarek; Badasa Moisa, Mitiku; Hailu, Samuel; Worku, Kenate
Abstract: Urban expansion possesses significant negative impacts on the&#xD;
environment, particularly in forest areas worldwide. This study&#xD;
aimed to analyze urban expansion by using stochastic modeling&#xD;
with the CA-Markov chain and multi-scenario prospects in Mettu&#xD;
area, Ethiopia. The Landsat images of 1986, 2000, and 2021 were&#xD;
used. The results reveal built-up areas gained 27.2%, of which&#xD;
cropland and forest accounted for 11.4 and 6.4%, respectively,&#xD;
within the 1986–2021 period. Despite the potential decline in&#xD;
urban growth rates, the model revealed that the spatial extent&#xD;
&#xD;
will likely expand twofold before the 2040s. In the rapid develop-&#xD;
ment (RD) scenario, urban development due to population&#xD;
&#xD;
increase will occur, which is also prevalent in the proposed suit-&#xD;
able urban expansion (PSUE) scenario, but the ecological and eco-&#xD;
nomic protection (EEP) scenario reveals very limited. The findings&#xD;
&#xD;
of this study will have far-reaching impacts on ecological and eco-&#xD;
nomic livelihoods unless green economy principles are effectively&#xD;
&#xD;
implemented.</description>
    <dc:date>2023-07-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/198">
    <title>Spatial modeling of soil loss as a response to land use-land cover change in Didessa sub-basin, the agricultural watershed of Ethiopia</title>
    <link>http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/198</link>
    <description>Title: Spatial modeling of soil loss as a response to land use-land cover change in Didessa sub-basin, the agricultural watershed of Ethiopia
Authors: Usman, Kelil; Tsegay Deribew, Kiros; Alemu, Girma; Hailu, Samuel
Abstract: Soil erosion is a vector of disturbances to agricultural productivity and economic development in&#xD;
the western highlands of Ethiopia. Yet, tough vegetation cover loss swapped to other land uses&#xD;
could have amplified the soil loss rate at which land cover change preceded, but little is known&#xD;
about their effects on soil loss in the Limu-Seqa watershed. This study was designed to evaluate&#xD;
the historical trends of the effects of land use-land cover change on soil erosion dynamics as a&#xD;
threshold for potential monitoring of soil loss. Satellite image data of 1987, 2002, 2021, and&#xD;
DEM-20 m resolution were used. The RUSLE model was applied with primary parameters to&#xD;
generate soil loss. Findings show that average annual soil loss increased from 4.5 in 1987 to 13.5 t&#xD;
ha− 1 yr− 1 in 2002 and surpassed to 45.35 t ha− 1 yr− 1 in 2021 as a result of LULC changes,&#xD;
particularly the transition of forest and overgrazed land to cropland (43.83%) and dense-forest to&#xD;
poor-open-up forest (6.92%) between 1987 and 2021. Soil loss during the recent study period was&#xD;
substantially affected by a substantial LULC change, from forest to cropland. The severe and very&#xD;
&#xD;
severe erosion risk categories jointly cover more than half of the entire catchment, which con-&#xD;
tributes to two-thirds of the total mean annual soil loss in the watershed, which is found to be&#xD;
&#xD;
over and above soil loss tolerance (SLT) in Ethiopia and tropical regions. Therefore, given the&#xD;
robust economic and political status of priority conservation measures, red hues areas are&#xD;
significant.</description>
    <dc:date>2023-03-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/183">
    <title>A Strategy for Mainstreaming Climate Information in Planning for Achievement of the  Millennium Development Goals</title>
    <link>http://repository.hoarec.org:80/home/handle/123456789/183</link>
    <description>Title: A Strategy for Mainstreaming Climate Information in Planning for Achievement of the  Millennium Development Goals
Authors: CLIMATE INFORMATION FOR DEVELOPMENT NEEDS AN ACTION PLAN FOR AFRICA
Abstract: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY&#xD;
Climate Information for Development Needs: An Action Plan for Africa was a joint initiative of the &#xD;
Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Secretariat,1&#xD;
 which took the lead in organizing the &#xD;
meeting, and the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), which hosted it. The US based International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) provided an analysis&#xD;
identifying gaps in the use of climate information. The meeting took place at UNECA&#xD;
headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 18-21 April 2006. The United Kingdom’s&#xD;
Department for International Development (DFID) provided substantial support for the meeting &#xD;
and for the IRI Gap Analysis. The UN Development Programme (UNDP)/Global Environment &#xD;
Facility (GEF) provided additional backing through its support of the GCOS Regional Workshop &#xD;
Programme.&#xD;
Approximately 100 people attended the Addis Ababa meeting, including senior representatives &#xD;
from a cross section of African regional institutions and political bodies (the African Union &#xD;
Commission (AUC), the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Southern African Development &#xD;
Community (SADC), and the Indian Ocean Commission); potential development partners (the &#xD;
United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Canada, UNDP, UNEP, &#xD;
and the European Commission (EC)); the user community (with strong representation from the &#xD;
health, water, agriculture, food security, disaster management, and marine sectors in particular); &#xD;
and the climate community (including, in particular, the GCOS Secretariat and the Secretariat &#xD;
and African Regional Association of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the IGAD &#xD;
Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), ACMAD, OSS, and a number of Africa's &#xD;
National Meteorological Services).&#xD;
The objectives of the meeting were to bring together stakeholders—providers and users of &#xD;
climate information, the development community, and representatives of African political&#xD;
institutions—to discuss key gaps in the use of climate information from the perspective of users &#xD;
and decisionmakers, to identify starting points on demand-led integrated climate information &#xD;
tools, to develop plans jointly with the African regional cooperation structures, and to agree &#xD;
among all stakeholders on an integrated strategy for launching a climate and development &#xD;
programme for Africa.&#xD;
The first day of the meeting was devoted to a series of presentations demonstrating the links &#xD;
between climate and sustainable development. The presentations helped to provide a common &#xD;
understanding of problems and a common vocabulary with which to discuss them. &#xD;
The second day was devoted to consideration of the IRI Gap Analysis. The participants&#xD;
considered gaps in integrating climate into policy, gaps in integrating climate risk management &#xD;
into development practices, gaps in climate services, and gaps in climate observations and data&#xD;
management as perceived by the various user communities. The participants also considered &#xD;
ways to eliminate the gaps and identified selection criteria for inclusion of projects in an &#xD;
integrated strategy for addressing climate and development. Possible selection criteria for near term projects included gap-bridging projects that would allow for early progress, pilot projects &#xD;
that could be scaled up at a later date, and activities that could be incorporated into existing &#xD;
initiatives (e.g., in the health and food security sectors). Integrated projects that would address &#xD;
gaps at multiple levels (e.g., central government, local government, and community levels), EXECUTIVE SUMMARY&#xD;
Climate Information for Development Needs: An Action Plan for Africa was a joint initiative of the &#xD;
Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Secretariat,1&#xD;
 which took the lead in organizing the &#xD;
meeting, and the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), which hosted it. The US based International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) provided an analysis&#xD;
identifying gaps in the use of climate information. The meeting took place at UNECA&#xD;
headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 18-21 April 2006. The United Kingdom’s&#xD;
Department for International Development (DFID) provided substantial support for the meeting &#xD;
and for the IRI Gap Analysis. The UN Development Programme (UNDP)/Global Environment &#xD;
Facility (GEF) provided additional backing through its support of the GCOS Regional Workshop &#xD;
Programme.&#xD;
Approximately 100 people attended the Addis Ababa meeting, including senior representatives &#xD;
from a cross section of African regional institutions and political bodies (the African Union &#xD;
Commission (AUC), the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Southern African Development &#xD;
Community (SADC), and the Indian Ocean Commission); potential development partners (the &#xD;
United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Canada, UNDP, UNEP, &#xD;
and the European Commission (EC)); the user community (with strong representation from the &#xD;
health, water, agriculture, food security, disaster management, and marine sectors in particular); &#xD;
and the climate community (including, in particular, the GCOS Secretariat and the Secretariat &#xD;
and African Regional Association of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the IGAD &#xD;
Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), ACMAD, OSS, and a number of Africa's &#xD;
National Meteorological Services).&#xD;
The objectives of the meeting were to bring together stakeholders—providers and users of &#xD;
climate information, the development community, and representatives of African political&#xD;
institutions—to discuss key gaps in the use of climate information from the perspective of users &#xD;
and decisionmakers, to identify starting points on demand-led integrated climate information &#xD;
tools, to develop plans jointly with the African regional cooperation structures, and to agree &#xD;
among all stakeholders on an integrated strategy for launching a climate and development &#xD;
programme for Africa.&#xD;
The first day of the meeting was devoted to a series of presentations demonstrating the links &#xD;
between climate and sustainable development. The presentations helped to provide a common &#xD;
understanding of problems and a common vocabulary with which to discuss them. &#xD;
The second day was devoted to consideration of the IRI Gap Analysis. The participants&#xD;
considered gaps in integrating climate into policy, gaps in integrating climate risk management &#xD;
into development practices, gaps in climate services, and gaps in climate observations and data&#xD;
management as perceived by the various user communities. The participants also considered &#xD;
ways to eliminate the gaps and identified selection criteria for inclusion of projects in an &#xD;
integrated strategy for addressing climate and development. Possible selection criteria for near term projects included gap-bridging projects that would allow for early progress, pilot projects &#xD;
that could be scaled up at a later date, and activities that could be incorporated into existing &#xD;
initiatives (e.g., in the health and food security sectors). Integrated projects that would address &#xD;
gaps at multiple levels (e.g., central government, local government, and community levels), EXECUTIVE SUMMARY&#xD;
Climate Information for Development Needs: An Action Plan for Africa was a joint initiative of the &#xD;
Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Secretariat,1&#xD;
 which took the lead in organizing the &#xD;
meeting, and the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), which hosted it. The US based International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) provided an analysis&#xD;
identifying gaps in the use of climate information. The meeting took place at UNECA&#xD;
headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 18-21 April 2006. The United Kingdom’s&#xD;
Department for International Development (DFID) provided substantial support for the meeting &#xD;
and for the IRI Gap Analysis. The UN Development Programme (UNDP)/Global Environment &#xD;
Facility (GEF) provided additional backing through its support of the GCOS Regional Workshop &#xD;
Programme.&#xD;
Approximately 100 people attended the Addis Ababa meeting, including senior representatives &#xD;
from a cross section of African regional institutions and political bodies (the African Union &#xD;
Commission (AUC), the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Southern African Development &#xD;
Community (SADC), and the Indian Ocean Commission); potential development partners (the &#xD;
United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Canada, UNDP, UNEP, &#xD;
and the European Commission (EC)); the user community (with strong representation from the &#xD;
health, water, agriculture, food security, disaster management, and marine sectors in particular); &#xD;
and the climate community (including, in particular, the GCOS Secretariat and the Secretariat &#xD;
and African Regional Association of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the IGAD &#xD;
Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), ACMAD, OSS, and a number of Africa's &#xD;
National Meteorological Services).&#xD;
The objectives of the meeting were to bring together stakeholders—providers and users of &#xD;
climate information, the development community, and representatives of African political&#xD;
institutions—to discuss key gaps in the use of climate information from the perspective of users &#xD;
and decisionmakers, to identify starting points on demand-led integrated climate information &#xD;
tools, to develop plans jointly with the African regional cooperation structures, and to agree &#xD;
among all stakeholders on an integrated strategy for launching a climate and development &#xD;
programme for Africa.&#xD;
The first day of the meeting was devoted to a series of presentations demonstrating the links &#xD;
between climate and sustainable development. The presentations helped to provide a common &#xD;
understanding of problems and a common vocabulary with which to discuss them. &#xD;
The second day was devoted to consideration of the IRI Gap Analysis. The participants&#xD;
considered gaps in integrating climate into policy, gaps in integrating climate risk management &#xD;
into development practices, gaps in climate services, and gaps in climate observations and data&#xD;
management as perceived by the various user communities. The participants also considered &#xD;
ways to eliminate the gaps and identified selection criteria for inclusion of projects in an &#xD;
integrated strategy for addressing climate and development. Possible selection criteria for near term projects included gap-bridging projects that would allow for early progress, pilot projects &#xD;
that could be scaled up at a later date, and activities that could be incorporated into existing &#xD;
initiatives (e.g., in the health and food security sectors). Integrated projects that would address &#xD;
gaps at multiple levels (e.g., central government, local government, and community levels), EXECUTIVE SUMMARY&#xD;
Climate Information for Development Needs: An Action Plan for Africa was a joint initiative of the &#xD;
Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Secretariat,1&#xD;
 which took the lead in organizing the &#xD;
meeting, and the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), which hosted it. The US based International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) provided an analysis&#xD;
identifying gaps in the use of climate information. The meeting took place at UNECA&#xD;
headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 18-21 April 2006. The United Kingdom’s&#xD;
Department for International Development (DFID) provided substantial support for the meeting &#xD;
and for the IRI Gap Analysis. The UN Development Programme (UNDP)/Global Environment &#xD;
Facility (GEF) provided additional backing through its support of the GCOS Regional Workshop &#xD;
Programme.&#xD;
Approximately 100 people attended the Addis Ababa meeting, including senior representatives &#xD;
from a cross section of African regional institutions and political bodies (the African Union &#xD;
Commission (AUC), the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Southern African Development &#xD;
Community (SADC), and the Indian Ocean Commission); potential development partners (the &#xD;
United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Canada, UNDP, UNEP, &#xD;
and the European Commission (EC)); the user community (with strong representation from the &#xD;
health, water, agriculture, food security, disaster management, and marine sectors in particular); &#xD;
and the climate community (including, in particular, the GCOS Secretariat and the Secretariat &#xD;
and African Regional Association of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the IGAD &#xD;
Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), ACMAD, OSS, and a number of Africa's &#xD;
National Meteorological Services).&#xD;
The objectives of the meeting were to bring together stakeholders—providers and users of &#xD;
climate information, the development community, and representatives of African political&#xD;
institutions—to discuss key gaps in the use of climate information from the perspective of users &#xD;
and decisionmakers, to identify starting points on demand-led integrated climate information &#xD;
tools, to develop plans jointly with the African regional cooperation structures, and to agree &#xD;
among all stakeholders on an integrated strategy for launching a climate and development &#xD;
programme for Africa.&#xD;
The first day of the meeting was devoted to a series of presentations demonstrating the links &#xD;
between climate and sustainable development. The presentations helped to provide a common &#xD;
understanding of problems and a common vocabulary with which to discuss them. &#xD;
The second day was devoted to consideration of the IRI Gap Analysis. The participants&#xD;
considered gaps in integrating climate into policy, gaps in integrating climate risk management &#xD;
into development practices, gaps in climate services, and gaps in climate observations and data&#xD;
management as perceived by the various user communities. The participants also considered &#xD;
ways to eliminate the gaps and identified selection criteria for inclusion of projects in an &#xD;
integrated strategy for addressing climate and development. Possible selection criteria for near term projects included gap-bridging projects that would allow for early progress, pilot projects &#xD;
that could be scaled up at a later date, and activities that could be incorporated into existing &#xD;
initiatives (e.g., in the health and food security sectors). Integrated projects that would address &#xD;
gaps at multiple levels (e.g., central government, local government, and community levels), EXECUTIVE SUMMARY&#xD;
Climate Information for Development Needs: An Action Plan for Africa was a joint initiative of the &#xD;
Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Secretariat,1&#xD;
 which took the lead in organizing the &#xD;
meeting, and the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), which hosted it. The US based International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) provided an analysis&#xD;
identifying gaps in the use of climate information. The meeting took place at UNECA&#xD;
headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 18-21 April 2006. The United Kingdom’s&#xD;
Department for International Development (DFID) provided substantial support for the meeting &#xD;
and for the IRI Gap Analysis. The UN Development Programme (UNDP)/Global Environment &#xD;
Facility (GEF) provided additional backing through its support of the GCOS Regional Workshop &#xD;
Programme.&#xD;
Approximately 100 people attended the Addis Ababa meeting, including senior representatives &#xD;
from a cross section of African regional institutions and political bodies (the African Union &#xD;
Commission (AUC), the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Southern African Development &#xD;
Community (SADC), and the Indian Ocean Commission); potential development partners (the &#xD;
United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Canada, UNDP, UNEP, &#xD;
and the European Commission (EC)); the user community (with strong representation from the &#xD;
health, water, agriculture, food security, disaster management, and marine sectors in particular); &#xD;
and the climate community (including, in particular, the GCOS Secretariat and the Secretariat &#xD;
and African Regional Association of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the IGAD &#xD;
Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), ACMAD, OSS, and a number of Africa's &#xD;
National Meteorological Services).&#xD;
The objectives of the meeting were to bring together stakeholders—providers and users of &#xD;
climate information, the development community, and representatives of African political&#xD;
institutions—to discuss key gaps in the use of climate information from the perspective of users &#xD;
and decisionmakers, to identify starting points on demand-led integrated climate information &#xD;
tools, to develop plans jointly with the African regional cooperation structures, and to agree &#xD;
among all stakeholders on an integrated strategy for launching a climate and development &#xD;
programme for Africa.&#xD;
The first day of the meeting was devoted to a series of presentations demonstrating the links &#xD;
between climate and sustainable development. The presentations helped to provide a common &#xD;
understanding of problems and a common vocabulary with which to discuss them. &#xD;
The second day was devoted to consideration of the IRI Gap Analysis. The participants&#xD;
considered gaps in integrating climate into policy, gaps in integrating climate risk management &#xD;
into development practices, gaps in climate services, and gaps in climate observations and data&#xD;
management as perceived by the various user communities. The participants also considered &#xD;
ways to eliminate the gaps and identified selection criteria for inclusion of projects in an &#xD;
integrated strategy for addressing climate and development. Possible selection criteria for near term projects included gap-bridging projects that would allow for early progress, pilot projects &#xD;
that could be scaled up at a later date, and activities that could be incorporated into existing &#xD;
initiatives (e.g., in the health and food security sectors). Integrated projects that would address &#xD;
gaps at multiple levels (e.g., central government, local government, and community levels), EXECUTIVE SUMMARY&#xD;
Climate Information for Development Needs: An Action Plan for Africa was a joint initiative of the &#xD;
Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Secretariat,1&#xD;
 which took the lead in organizing the &#xD;
meeting, and the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), which hosted it. The US based International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) provided an analysis&#xD;
identifying gaps in the use of climate information. The meeting took place at UNECA&#xD;
headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 18-21 April 2006. The United Kingdom’s&#xD;
Department for International Development (DFID) provided substantial support for the meeting &#xD;
and for the IRI Gap Analysis. The UN Development Programme (UNDP)/Global Environment &#xD;
Facility (GEF) provided additional backing through its support of the GCOS Regional Workshop &#xD;
Programme.&#xD;
Approximately 100 people attended the Addis Ababa meeting, including senior representatives &#xD;
from a cross section of African regional institutions and political bodies (the African Union &#xD;
Commission (AUC), the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Southern African Development &#xD;
Community (SADC), and the Indian Ocean Commission); potential development partners (the &#xD;
United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Canada, UNDP, UNEP, &#xD;
and the European Commission (EC)); the user community (with strong representation from the &#xD;
health, water, agriculture, food security, disaster management, and marine sectors in particular); &#xD;
and the climate community (including, in particular, the GCOS Secretariat and the Secretariat &#xD;
and African Regional Association of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the IGAD &#xD;
Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), ACMAD, OSS, and a number of Africa's &#xD;
National Meteorological Services).&#xD;
The objectives of the meeting were to bring together stakeholders—providers and users of &#xD;
climate information, the development community, and representatives of African political&#xD;
institutions—to discuss key gaps in the use of climate information from the perspective of users &#xD;
and decisionmakers, to identify starting points on demand-led integrated climate information &#xD;
tools, to develop plans jointly with the African regional cooperation structures, and to agree &#xD;
among all stakeholders on an integrated strategy for launching a climate and development &#xD;
programme for Africa.&#xD;
The first day of the meeting was devoted to a series of presentations demonstrating the links &#xD;
between climate and sustainable development. The presentations helped to provide a common &#xD;
understanding of problems and a common vocabulary with which to discuss them. &#xD;
The second day was devoted to consideration of the IRI Gap Analysis. The participants&#xD;
considered gaps in integrating climate into policy, gaps in integrating climate risk management &#xD;
into development practices, gaps in climate services, and gaps in climate observations and data&#xD;
management as perceived by the various user communities. The participants also considered &#xD;
ways to eliminate the gaps and identified selection criteria for inclusion of projects in an &#xD;
integrated strategy for addressing climate and development. Possible selection criteria for near term projects included gap-bridging projects that would allow for early progress, pilot projects &#xD;
that could be scaled up at a later date, and activities that could be incorporated into existing &#xD;
initiatives (e.g., in the health and food security sectors). Integrated projects that would address &#xD;
gaps at multiple levels (e.g., central government, local government, and community levels), EXECUTIVE SUMMARY&#xD;
Climate Information for Development Needs: An Action Plan for Africa was a joint initiative of the &#xD;
Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Secretariat,1&#xD;
 which took the lead in organizing the &#xD;
meeting, and the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), which hosted it. The US based International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) provided an analysis&#xD;
identifying gaps in the use of climate information. The meeting took place at UNECA&#xD;
headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 18-21 April 2006. The United Kingdom’s&#xD;
Department for International Development (DFID) provided substantial support for the meeting &#xD;
and for the IRI Gap Analysis. The UN Development Programme (UNDP)/Global Environment &#xD;
Facility (GEF) provided additional backing through its support of the GCOS Regional Workshop &#xD;
Programme.&#xD;
Approximately 100 people attended the Addis Ababa meeting, including senior representatives &#xD;
from a cross section of African regional institutions and political bodies (the African Union &#xD;
Commission (AUC), the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Southern African Development &#xD;
Community (SADC), and the Indian Ocean Commission); potential development partners (the &#xD;
United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Canada, UNDP, UNEP, &#xD;
and the European Commission (EC)); the user community (with strong representation from the &#xD;
health, water, agriculture, food security, disaster management, and marine sectors in particular); &#xD;
and the climate community (including, in particular, the GCOS Secretariat and the Secretariat &#xD;
and African Regional Association of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the IGAD &#xD;
Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), ACMAD, OSS, and a number of Africa's &#xD;
National Meteorological Services).&#xD;
The objectives of the meeting were to bring together stakeholders—providers and users of &#xD;
climate information, the development community, and representatives of African political&#xD;
institutions—to discuss key gaps in the use of climate information from the perspective of users &#xD;
and decisionmakers, to identify starting points on demand-led integrated climate information &#xD;
tools, to develop plans jointly with the African regional cooperation structures, and to agree &#xD;
among all stakeholders on an integrated strategy for launching a climate and development &#xD;
programme for Africa.&#xD;
The first day of the meeting was devoted to a series of presentations demonstrating the links &#xD;
between climate and sustainable development. The presentations helped to provide a common &#xD;
understanding of problems and a common vocabulary with which to discuss them. &#xD;
The second day was devoted to consideration of the IRI Gap Analysis. The participants&#xD;
considered gaps in integrating climate into policy, gaps in integrating climate risk management &#xD;
into development practices, gaps in climate services, and gaps in climate observations and data&#xD;
management as perceived by the various user communities. The participants also considered &#xD;
ways to eliminate the gaps and identified selection criteria for inclusion of projects in an &#xD;
integrated strategy for addressing climate and development. Possible selection criteria for near term projects included gap-bridging projects that would allow for early progress, pilot projects &#xD;
that could be scaled up at a later date, and activities that could be incorporated into existing &#xD;
initiatives (e.g., in the health and food security sectors). Integrated projects that would address &#xD;
gaps at multiple levels (e.g., central government, local government, and community levels), EXECUTIVE SUMMARY&#xD;
Climate Information for Development Needs: An Action Plan for Africa was a joint initiative of the &#xD;
Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Secretariat,1&#xD;
 which took the lead in organizing the &#xD;
meeting, and the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), which hosted it. The US based International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) provided an analysis&#xD;
identifying gaps in the use of climate information. The meeting took place at UNECA&#xD;
headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 18-21 April 2006. The United Kingdom’s&#xD;
Department for International Development (DFID) provided substantial support for the meeting &#xD;
and for the IRI Gap Analysis. The UN Development Programme (UNDP)/Global Environment &#xD;
Facility (GEF) provided additional backing through its support of the GCOS Regional Workshop &#xD;
Programme.&#xD;
Approximately 100 people attended the Addis Ababa meeting, including senior representatives &#xD;
from a cross section of African regional institutions and political bodies (the African Union &#xD;
Commission (AUC), the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Southern African Development &#xD;
Community (SADC), and the Indian Ocean Commission); potential development partners (the &#xD;
United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Canada, UNDP, UNEP, &#xD;
and the European Commission (EC)); the user community (with strong representation from the &#xD;
health, water, agriculture, food security, disaster management, and marine sectors in particular); &#xD;
and the climate community (including, in particular, the GCOS Secretariat and the Secretariat &#xD;
and African Regional Association of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the IGAD &#xD;
Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC), ACMAD, OSS, and a number of Africa's &#xD;
National Meteorological Services).&#xD;
The objectives of the meeting were to bring together stakeholders—providers and users of &#xD;
climate information, the development community, and representatives of African political&#xD;
institutions—to discuss key gaps in the use of climate information from the perspective of users &#xD;
and decisionmakers, to identify starting points on demand-led integrated climate information &#xD;
tools, to develop plans jointly with the African regional cooperation structures, and to agree &#xD;
among all stakeholders on an integrated strategy for launching a climate and development &#xD;
programme for Africa.&#xD;
The first day of the meeting was devoted to a series of presentations demonstrating the links &#xD;
between climate and sustainable development. The presentations helped to provide a common &#xD;
understanding of problems and a common vocabulary with which to discuss them. &#xD;
The second day was devoted to consideration of the IRI Gap Analysis. The participants&#xD;
considered gaps in integrating climate into policy, gaps in integrating climate risk management &#xD;
into development practices, gaps in climate services, and gaps in climate observations and data&#xD;
management as perceived by the various user communities. The participants also considered &#xD;
ways to eliminate the gaps and identified selection criteria for inclusion of projects in an &#xD;
integrated strategy for addressing climate and development. Possible selection criteria for near term projects included gap-bridging projects that would allow for early progress, pilot projects &#xD;
that could be scaled up at a later date, and activities that could be incorporated into existing &#xD;
initiatives (e.g., in the health and food security sectors). Integrated projects that would address &#xD;
gaps at multiple levels (e.g., central government, local government, and community levels), and/or that would promote sharing of acquired knowledge regionally were considered to be of &#xD;
particular importance.&#xD;
On the third day of the meeting, prospective development partners expressed their views. The &#xD;
greatest challenge, as seen by some, is to have the climate experts work with sectoral&#xD;
development experts in a way that influences both policy and practice to provide what poor &#xD;
people need. An additional challenge is to engage governments and donors in dialogue on the &#xD;
likely impact of climate change on national poverty reduction strategies and on planning for the &#xD;
adaptation that inevitably will be necessary. Development experts seek to be able to add a new &#xD;
tool, climate risk management, to their planning toolboxes and thus help ensure that the &#xD;
development gains they have helped foster will not be lost as a result of climate change. All &#xD;
agreed on the need for a common framework for action based on the Gap Analysis, the&#xD;
Regional Action Plans, and expressions of support for the process by the G8 countries. &#xD;
Identification of a common framework for action was thus the subject of the last day of the&#xD;
meeting. The participants considered, revised, and reached consensus on an overall strategy &#xD;
for a programme to help deliver and sustain those Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that &#xD;
are climate sensitive. The programme, to be known as “Climate for Development in Africa,” or &#xD;
ClimDev Africa, involves four inter-related thrusts or Result Areas:&#xD;
· Policy: awareness raising, accountability, and advocacy;&#xD;
· Climate risk management;&#xD;
· Climate services; and&#xD;
· Climate observations, data management, and infrastructure (based on priorities and&#xD;
projects proposed in the GCOS Regional Action Plans).&#xD;
It was agreed that implementation of the Strategy should proceed via a set of clearly defined, &#xD;
focused, and costed projects in each of the four Result Areas coordinated through, or in close &#xD;
consultation with, the various responsible regional and national organizations. In the case of the &#xD;
Result Areas focused on Policy and Climate Risk Management, it was proposed that the &#xD;
responsible regional organizations begin by commissioning a rapid audit of action already &#xD;
completed or underway at regional and national levels with a view to formulation of a set of &#xD;
initial projects for addressing the highest priority needs. In the case of the Result Areas focused &#xD;
on Climate Services and Observations and Data Management, it was proposed that&#xD;
implementation proceed, within the overall framework of GCOS Africa, on the basis of an&#xD;
integrated set of updated, elaborated and re-costed priority projects from the Regional Action &#xD;
Plans and including, in the case of Climate Services, additional projects based on an initial audit &#xD;
of existing climate service capabilities under the overall framework of the World Climate&#xD;
Applications and Services Programme (WCASP).&#xD;
All four programme thrusts should be implemented in 3 phases over a 10-year period in order to &#xD;
assist in achieving the MDGs by 2015. Phase 1 should initiate several demonstration projects, &#xD;
focusing on a limited number of countries. Phase 2 should focus on scaling up demonstration &#xD;
projects, and Phase 3 should undertake full-scale implementation on a continent-wide basis.&#xD;
The essential conditions for successful implementation of the strategy for "Climate for&#xD;
Development in Africa" will be adequate donor funding in line with the G8 Gleneagles&#xD;
commitment and strong commitment from the responsible regional and national organizations in &#xD;
Africa. This will involve the following 'Next Steps,’ as agreed at the Addis Ababa meeting:&#xD;
· DFID and GCOS will help identify additional funding partners;&#xD;
· UNECA, AfDB, and the AUC will jointly endorse letters to the G8 countries for assistance &#xD;
with implementation of the Strategy;&#xD;
· GCOS will approach the Africa-Caribbean-Pacific (ACP) Secretariat with a view to&#xD;
securing European Commission (EC) funding for Phase 2;&#xD;
· The National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHSs) of Africa will develop a &#xD;
coordinated approach, with WMO assistance, to improve climate observations and&#xD;
services necessary for achieving the MDGs;&#xD;
· The IRI will prepare a document on best practices for demand-led climate information &#xD;
services for development in Africa, for use as an information and advocacy tool.</description>
    <dc:date>2016-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

